Tyre recycling faces significant regulatory challenges that affect the efficiency and implementation of recycling processes. A central issue is the contradictory EU regulations, particularly regarding sustainable public procurement. The EU Taxonomy Regulation, which aims to promote environmentally sustainable economic activities, often excludes retreaded tyres due to their lack of inclusion in the tyre labelling regulation. This leads to retreaded tyres not being considered in many public tenders, even though they are comparable to new tyres in terms of environmental and safety properties.
Another problem is the lack of a tyre label for retreaded tyres, which would allow their integration into EU regulations. The European Retreading Association BIPAVER and the Alliance for the Future of Tyres (AZuR) have been advocating for years for the inclusion of retreaded truck and bus tyres (C3 tyres) in the tyre labelling regulation. Until this is achieved, the planning security for companies in the retreading industry remains low, hindering investments and developments.
The current regulatory situation not only burdens the economic viability of retreading companies but also contradicts the EU's climate goals. Retreaded tyres offer significant ecological advantages over new tyres, including a reduction in CO2 emissions by over 60% and a saving of around two-thirds of the required raw materials, primarily rubber. These advantages could be better utilised through improved regulatory support and adaptation of existing regulations.
Overall, it is clear that clear and consistent regulations are necessary to fully exploit the potential of tyre recycling and to contribute to European environmental and climate goals.